Overall coverage
Transitional
65%
89 / 140 points
Coverage = unweighted mean of the 10 dimension coverages (not points ÷ max)
Maturity distribution
Modern 5Transitional 5Tech Debt 0
Coverage vs. portfolio
app vs. avg (dashed)Score vs. gap by dimension
Prioritized remediation
No recommendations recorded.
Per-question assessment
click a dimension to expand · colored answer chips▸ FAIR & Discoverability 0 gaps 60%
The dataset or system is findable in a searchable catalog or inventory (e.g., ).
YesA named data owner or steward is formally assigned and documented.
YesAccess and usage conditions, including legal and compliance constraints, are documented and available to users.
YesWhat is the percentage of the data uses standardized terminologies such as RTiS.
0.0Data lineage is captured for key data flows and is maintained over time.
None▸ IAM, Privacy & Security 2 gaps 67%
The system uses the approved corporate identity provider for user authentication (e.g., Roche SSO via PingFederate, OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect).
YesData is encrypted in transit.
YesData is encrypted at rest.
NoSecrets are managed in an approved central vault (e.g., HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager).
NoAccess rights and permissions are reviewed and formally certified at defined intervals.
YesNo shared or generic privileged accounts exist in the production environment.
Yes▸ Platform / Hosting / Infrastructure 1 gap 75%
Infrastructure is provisioned declaratively using Infrastructure as Code.
PartialThe system uses approved shared internal platforms or Golden Paths, where applicable. (e.g., Minerva Application Blueprint)
Yes▸ Architecture & Interoperability 3 gaps 38%
Can we swap in and out components without modifying the system.
PartialAll application services are exposed through clear and defined interfaces.
YesData contracts are documented and governed.
NoAPI lifecycle management is actively implemented using Gravitee.
No▸ Reliability 3 gaps 33%
All critical services have defined SLAs and SLOs.
PartialMajor incidents are followed by systematic postmortems, and resulting corrective actions are tracked to closure in the backlog.
PartialSLIs are defined and calculated for all established SLAs and SLOs, and are visible to stakeholders and system owners.
No▸ Scalability & Performance 1 gap 75%
The system supports automated vertical and horizontal scaling based on real-time demand, where applicable.
PartialLoad and performance testing are performed routinely and included in major release cycles.
Yes▸ Deployment Automation 3 gaps 60%
Core workloads are supported by a complete CI/CD pipeline.
YesBuilds, tests, and deployments are executed through fully automated processes.
PartialAutomated quality gates are enforced before production deployment. (e.g., SonarQube)
PartialProduction rollback or deployment occurs regularly and within the last 6 months.
NoBuild artifacts and dependencies are managed in a traceable and controlled manner.
Yes▸ Observability 0 gaps 100%
All critical services generate standard telemetry, including logs, metrics, and traces.
YesObservability data is available through approved central monitoring and observability tools.
YesIncident analysis can be performed across upstream and downstream dependencies.
Yes▸ Resilience & Recovery 2 gaps 50%
Critical services and data have defined Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) targets.
PartialBackup, restore, and recovery procedures, including assigned roles and responsibilities, are documented and tested.
Partial▸ Cost Transparency & FinOps 0 gaps 92%
Cost visibility is available at component, system, product family, or domain level.
SystemCost is reviewed regularly together with usage and business value by the owning team.
YesArchitectural decisions explicitly consider cost as a primary decision variable.
Yes